TACU vs. TGRW
TACU (T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF) and TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TACU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TACU charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TGRW.
Performance
TACU vs. TGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TACU achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than TGRW's -0.85% return.
TACU
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TGRW
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- 11.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
TACU vs. TGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF | 7.69% | -0.70% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | -0.85% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TACU and TGRW is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TACU vs. TGRW — Risk / Return Rank
TACU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TGRW
TACU vs. TGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF (TACU) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TACU | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TACU vs. TGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TACU drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum TGRW drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACU and TGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TACU | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -43.33% | +34.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -7.98% | +5.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.62% | -12.40% | +10.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.09% | — |
Volatility
TACU vs. TGRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TACU | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 17.35% | -3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 23.40% | -9.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 23.03% | -9.18% |
TACU vs. TGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TACU has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRW's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
TACU vs. TGRW - Dividend Comparison
Neither TACU nor TGRW has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, TACU and TGRW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TACU is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TACU is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.
TACU and TGRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TACU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for TACU and 0.52% for TGRW.
Find the right allocation for TACU and TGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer