TACU vs. TGRW

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TACU (T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF) and TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TACU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TACU charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TGRW.

Performance

TACU vs. TGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF (TACU) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TACU achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly higher than TGRW's 2.28% return.

TACU

• 1D: -2.43%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 7.92%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TGRW

• 1D: -3.40%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 2.28%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 17.15%
• 3Y*: 20.90%
• 5Y*: 8.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TACU vs. TGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF	7.92%	-0.66%
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF	2.28%	-0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TACU and TGRW is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

TACU vs. TGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGRW

TGRW Risk / Return Rank: 26
TGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
TGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
TGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 28
TGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
TGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TACU vs. TGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF (TACU) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TACU	TGRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	0.50	+0.65

Drawdowns

TACU vs. TGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TACU drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum TGRW drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACU and TGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TACU	TGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.91%	-43.33%	+34.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	-5.08%	+2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-12.46%	+10.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TACU	TGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.75%	16.91%	-3.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.75%	23.30%	-9.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.75%	23.05%	-9.30%

TACU vs. TGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TACU has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRW's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

TACU vs. TGRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither TACU nor TGRW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.40%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TACU and TGRW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, TACU and TGRW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, TACU or TGRW?

On fees, TACU is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TACU or TGRW?

TACU is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TACU or TGRW?

TACU and TGRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TACU and TGRW?

TACU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for TACU and 0.52% for TGRW.