TACU vs. SPTM
TACU (T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TACU is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TACU charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
TACU vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TACU achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 8.71% return.
TACU
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 25.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
TACU vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF | 7.92% | -0.66% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 8.71% | -0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between TACU and SPTM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TACU vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
TACU
SPTM
TACU vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF (TACU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TACU | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.45 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
TACU vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TACU drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACU and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TACU | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -54.80% | +45.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -2.80% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -9.05% | +7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.87% | — |
Volatility
TACU vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TACU | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.75% | 12.16% | +1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 16.90% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 18.05% | -4.30% |
TACU vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TACU has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TACU vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
TACU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, TACU and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for TACU.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for TACU.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for TACU and 0.03% for SPTM.
Find the right allocation for TACU and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer