TACU vs. DFND
TACU (T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TACU is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TACU charges 0.14%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
TACU vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TACU
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.03%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
TACU vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF | 7.69% | -0.70% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | -0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between TACU and DFND is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TACU vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF (TACU) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TACU | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TACU vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TACU drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACU and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TACU | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -22.65% | +13.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -3.69% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.62% | -5.70% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility
TACU vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TACU | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 10.88% | +2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 22.44% | -8.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 19.08% | -5.23% |
TACU vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
TACU has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TACU vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
Neither TACU nor DFND has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.29% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TACU and DFND have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TACU is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TACU is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for TACU.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for TACU and 1.50% for DFND.
Find the right allocation for TACU and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer