PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TACK vs. MGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TACK vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TACK vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund
2.15%10.93%11.76%7.43%-5.41%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
-4.86%19.31%27.16%29.77%-14.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TACK achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's -4.86% return.


TACK

1D
0.40%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
2.15%
6M
2.45%
1Y
13.43%
3Y*
9.40%
5Y*
10Y*

MGC

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TACK vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TACK has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TACK vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TACK
TACK Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TACK vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TACKMGCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

1.01

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

1.56

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.64

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.72

7.19

-0.46

TACK vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TACK Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TACK and MGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TACKMGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.01

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.56

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between TACK and MGC is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TACK vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

TACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than MGC's 1.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund
1.24%1.18%1.26%1.29%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
1.01%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%

Drawdowns

TACK vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TACK drawdown since its inception was -14.49%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACK and MGC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TACKMGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.49%

-51.93%

+37.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-11.93%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-6.33%

+2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-7.12%

+2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.72%

-0.68%

Volatility

TACK vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) is 4.06%, while Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that TACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TACKMGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

5.54%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

9.86%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

18.80%

-5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.33%

17.26%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.33%

18.19%

-6.86%