TAAGX vs. BFGFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TAAGX (Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund) and BFGFX (Baron Focused Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TAAGX returned 16.71%/yr vs 21.92%/yr for BFGFX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TAAGX charges 1.61%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for BFGFX.

Performance

TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAAGX achieves a 39.80% return, which is significantly higher than BFGFX's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, TAAGX has underperformed BFGFX with an annualized return of 16.71%, while BFGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.92% annualized return.

TAAGX

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: 7.39%
• YTD: 39.80%
• 6M: 37.61%
• 1Y: 64.86%
• 3Y*: 34.69%
• 5Y*: 18.07%
• 10Y*: 16.71%

BFGFX

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 12.63%
• YTD: 11.20%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 33.93%
• 3Y*: 22.91%
• 5Y*: 14.16%
• 10Y*: 21.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund	39.80%	16.01%	36.81%	26.46%	-25.98%	17.90%	36.11%	27.71%	-12.17%	19.12%
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund	11.20%	21.94%	29.52%	27.40%	-28.21%	18.67%	122.38%	30.05%	3.76%	26.36%

Correlation

The correlation between TAAGX and BFGFX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2004	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between TAAGX and BFGFX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TAAGX vs. BFGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAAGX

TAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 90
TAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
TAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
TAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
TAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

BFGFX

BFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 53
BFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TAAGX	BFGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	1.60	+1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	2.92	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.34	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.04	3.46	+3.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.01	9.28	+17.73

TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAAGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the BFGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAAGX and BFGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAAGX drawdown since its inception was -62.13%, roughly equal to the maximum BFGFX drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAAGX and BFGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAAGX	BFGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.13%	-59.52%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.26%	-9.74%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.24%	-21.00%	-8.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.47%	-35.93%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.47%	-43.62%	+9.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.92%	+3.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.66%	-12.34%	-6.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	3.63%	-1.22%

Volatility

TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) is 9.06%, while Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that TAAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAAGX	BFGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.06%	9.75%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.33%	14.32%	+4.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.24%	21.03%	+1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.62%	22.66%	+0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.43%	24.15%	-1.72%

TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAAGX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is higher than BFGFX's 1.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Dividend Comparison

TAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while BFGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.28%	15.53%	2.85%	1.78%	1.07%	2.11%	6.02%	5.80%
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund	2.46%	3.44%	17.62%	3.12%	3.06%	8.89%	5.75%	0.00%	7.57%	0.00%	0.00%	15.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TAAGX and BFGFX in my portfolio?

TAAGX and BFGFX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TAAGX or BFGFX?

BFGFX has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to TAAGX (9.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAAGX dropped -62.13% vs BFGFX's -59.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.