TAAGX vs. BFGFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX).
TAAGX is managed by Timothy Plan. It was launched on Oct 5, 2000. BFGFX is managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc.. It was launched on Jun 30, 2008.
Performance
TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 10.71% | 16.01% | 25.45% | 26.46% | -25.98% | 17.90% | 36.11% | 27.71% | -12.17% | 19.12% |
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund | -5.05% | 21.94% | 29.52% | 27.40% | -28.21% | 18.67% | 122.38% | 30.05% | 3.76% | 26.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAAGX achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly higher than BFGFX's -5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TAAGX has underperformed BFGFX with an annualized return of 13.08%, while BFGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.15% annualized return.
TAAGX
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 48.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
BFGFX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- -5.05%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 25.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- 20.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAAGX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is higher than BFGFX's 1.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TAAGX vs. BFGFX — Risk / Return Rank
TAAGX
BFGFX
TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAAGX | BFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.01 | 1.13 | +0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 1.99 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 2.29 | +1.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.43 | 8.56 | +8.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAAGX | BFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 1.13 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.45 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.84 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.69 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between TAAGX and BFGFX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Dividend Comparison
TAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, while BFGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 3.10% | 3.44% | 8.81% | 3.12% | 3.06% | 8.89% | 5.75% | 0.00% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.71% |
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.28% | 15.53% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.11% | 6.02% | 5.80% |
Drawdowns
TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAAGX drawdown since its inception was -62.13%, roughly equal to the maximum BFGFX drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAAGX and BFGFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAAGX | BFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.13% | -59.52% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -11.95% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.47% | -35.93% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.47% | -43.62% | +9.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.56% | -7.56% | +2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -12.43% | -6.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 3.19% | -0.36% |
Volatility
TAAGX vs. BFGFX - Volatility Comparison
Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) has a higher volatility of 9.62% compared to Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) at 4.99%. This indicates that TAAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TAAGX | BFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.62% | 4.99% | +4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.80% | 15.79% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.69% | 23.03% | +1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 22.57% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 23.96% | -1.94% |