PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFGFX vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFGFX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFGFX achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BFGFX having a 21.92% annualized return and QQQ not far ahead at 22.48%.


BFGFX

1D
-0.76%
1M
12.63%
YTD
11.20%
6M
8.27%
1Y
33.93%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
21.92%

QQQ

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.96%
YTD
20.41%
6M
19.46%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
27.47%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
22.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFGFX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFGFX
Baron Focused Growth Fund
11.20%21.94%29.52%27.40%-28.21%18.67%122.38%30.05%3.76%26.36%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.41%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BFGFX and QQQ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2004

0.68

The correlation between BFGFX and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFGFX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFGFX
BFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFGFX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFGFXQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.44

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.28

12.79

-3.51

BFGFX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFGFX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFGFX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFGFX drawdown since its inception was -59.52%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFGFX and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFGFXQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.52%

-82.97%

+23.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-11.96%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.00%

-22.77%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.93%

-35.12%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.62%

-35.12%

-8.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.92%

-0.99%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.34%

-32.73%

+20.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

3.21%

+0.42%

Volatility

BFGFX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) has a higher volatility of 9.75% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 8.47%. This indicates that BFGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFGFXQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.75%

8.47%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.32%

14.20%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.03%

17.67%

+3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.66%

22.64%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.15%

22.43%

+1.72%

BFGFX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFGFX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFGFX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

BFGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFGFX
Baron Focused Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.28%15.53%2.85%1.78%1.07%2.11%6.02%5.80%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.49%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFGFX and QQQ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFGFX has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to QQQ (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFGFX dropped -59.52% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFGFX and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer