T vs. STRL
T (AT&T Inc.) and STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, T returned 3.33%/yr vs 67.37%/yr for STRL. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 180.50% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 3.33%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 67.37% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
STRL
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 180.50%
- 6M
- 172.57%
- 1Y
- 323.17%
- 3Y*
- 152.83%
- 5Y*
- 104.12%
- 10Y*
- 67.37%
T vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 180.50% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and STRL is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.13 |
The correlation between T and STRL shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
T:
$3.04
STRL:
$11.19
T:
7.74
STRL:
76.77
T:
0.32
STRL:
1.63
T:
1.35
STRL:
9.22
T:
$125.65B
STRL:
$2.88B
T:
$105.41B
STRL:
$664.66M
T:
$54.70B
STRL:
$429.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank
T
STRL
T vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.54 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 10.41 | -11.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 28.52 | -29.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and STRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -92.51% | +28.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.87% | -31.02% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -47.67% | +25.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -47.67% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -59.60% | +17.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.12% | -13.56% | -4.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -46.29% | +30.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.64% | 11.30% | -0.66% |
Volatility
T vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AT&T Inc. (T) is 8.21%, while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 27.60%. This indicates that T experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 27.60% | -19.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 65.26% | -47.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 82.41% | -60.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 57.29% | -33.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 53.58% | -29.85% |
Dividends
T vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, while STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. STRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and STRL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (27.60%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs STRL's -92.51%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and STRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer