T vs. SMH
T (AT&T Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, T returned 3.62%/yr vs 37.68%/yr for SMH. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -3.08% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 3.62%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.68% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- -4.42%
- 1M
- -9.77%
- YTD
- -3.08%
- 6M
- -4.92%
- 1Y
- -12.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
T vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -3.08% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and SMH is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2000 | 0.27 |
The correlation between T and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
T
SMH
T vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| T | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.72 | -0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 10.59 | -11.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 40.63 | -41.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| T | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 5.19 | -5.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 1.13 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 1.16 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.34 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
T vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -84.96% | +20.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.60% | -14.93% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.60% | -35.74% | +15.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -45.30% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -45.30% | +2.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.23% | 0.00% | -18.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -41.09% | +25.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.08% | 3.89% | +6.19% |
Volatility
T vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AT&T Inc. (T) is 6.96%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that T experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 11.47% | -4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.27% | 24.29% | -7.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.86% | 30.56% | -8.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 35.01% | -11.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 32.57% | -8.88% |
Dividends
T vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
T and SMH have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to T (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer