T vs. KGC
T (AT&T Inc.) and KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while KGC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, T returned 3.33%/yr vs 18.81%/yr for KGC. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly higher than KGC's -8.92% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed KGC with an annualized return of 3.33%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.81% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
KGC
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -18.08%
- YTD
- -8.92%
- 6M
- -8.14%
- 1Y
- 65.63%
- 3Y*
- 76.13%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
T vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | -8.92% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and KGC is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 1994 | 0.07 |
The correlation between T and KGC shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
T:
$3.04
KGC:
$2.35
T:
7.74
KGC:
10.87
T:
0.32
KGC:
0.14
T:
1.35
KGC:
3.92
T:
$125.65B
KGC:
$7.94B
T:
$105.41B
KGC:
$4.19B
T:
$54.70B
KGC:
$5.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
T
KGC
T vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.24 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 1.75 | -2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 5.20 | -6.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and KGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -96.00% | +31.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.87% | -37.69% | +15.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -37.69% | +15.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -59.29% | +27.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -67.75% | +25.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.12% | -32.63% | +14.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -57.60% | +41.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.64% | 12.66% | -2.02% |
Volatility
T vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AT&T Inc. (T) is 8.21%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a volatility of 18.21%. This indicates that T experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 18.21% | -10.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 40.59% | -22.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 51.35% | -29.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 44.22% | -20.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 47.01% | -23.28% |
Dividends
T vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than KGC's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.57% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and KGC have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KGC has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs KGC's -96.00%.
KGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and KGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer