T vs. DUK
T (AT&T Inc.) and DUK (Duke Energy Corporation) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while DUK operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, T returned 2.10%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for DUK. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. DUK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -7.04% return, which is significantly lower than DUK's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed DUK with an annualized return of 2.10%, while DUK has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
DUK
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 10.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.49%
T vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -7.04% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
DUK Duke Energy Corporation | 9.53% | 12.72% | 15.56% | -1.63% | 2.03% | 19.11% | 4.77% | 10.29% | 7.41% | 12.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and DUK is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984 | 0.36 |
Fundamentals
T:
$152.52B
DUK:
$98.11B
T:
$3.05
DUK:
$6.61
T:
7.19
DUK:
19.05
T:
0.30
DUK:
1.49
T:
1.25
DUK:
2.94
T:
$125.65B
DUK:
$33.29B
T:
$105.41B
DUK:
$19.45B
T:
$54.70B
DUK:
$15.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank
T
DUK
T vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | DUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.12 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 0.95 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 2.16 | -3.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum DUK drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and DUK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | DUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -71.92% | +7.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.89% | -10.88% | -18.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.89% | -11.59% | -17.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -24.16% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -37.37% | -4.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.57% | -4.62% | -16.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.74% | -10.84% | -4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.94% | 4.77% | +8.17% |
Volatility
T vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison
AT&T Inc. (T) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) at 6.19%. This indicates that T's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | DUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 6.19% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.91% | 12.24% | +7.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.72% | 15.65% | +8.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 17.93% | +6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 20.45% | +3.47% |
Dividends
T vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than DUK's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUK Duke Energy Corporation | 3.66% | 3.60% | 3.84% | 4.18% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 4.17% | 4.11% | 4.21% | 4.15% | 4.33% | 4.54% |
T AT&T Inc. | 6.58% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. DUK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Duke Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and DUK have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
T has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to DUK (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs DUK's -71.92%.
DUK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and DUK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer