T vs. CAH
T (AT&T Inc.) and CAH (Cardinal Health, Inc.) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while CAH operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, T returned 3.33%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for CAH. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. CAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than CAH's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed CAH with an annualized return of 3.33%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
CAH
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 20.12%
- YTD
- 9.47%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 41.03%
- 3Y*
- 38.77%
- 5Y*
- 33.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
T vs. CAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 9.47% | 76.25% | 19.01% | 34.15% | 54.08% | -0.40% | 10.09% | 18.04% | -24.50% | -12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and CAH is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987 | 0.23 |
The correlation between T and CAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
T:
$3.04
CAH:
$6.55
T:
7.74
CAH:
34.17
T:
0.32
CAH:
0.81
T:
1.35
CAH:
0.21
T:
$125.65B
CAH:
$250.55B
T:
$105.41B
CAH:
$9.23B
T:
$54.70B
CAH:
$2.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. CAH — Risk / Return Rank
T
CAH
T vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.30 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 2.02 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 5.31 | -6.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, roughly equal to the maximum CAH drawdown of -61.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and CAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -61.93% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.87% | -20.42% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -20.42% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -22.80% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -46.13% | +3.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.12% | -2.39% | -15.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -15.94% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.64% | 7.75% | +2.89% |
Volatility
T vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison
AT&T Inc. (T) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) at 7.19%. This indicates that T's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 7.19% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 20.32% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 30.30% | -8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 25.24% | -1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 29.26% | -5.53% |
Dividends
T vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than CAH's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. CAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and CAH have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to CAH (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs CAH's -61.93%.
CAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and CAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer