PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
T vs. BAESY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

T vs. BAESY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. (T) and BAE Systems PLC (BAESY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than BAESY's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed BAESY with an annualized return of 3.33%, while BAESY has yielded a comparatively higher 18.72% annualized return.


T

1D
2.52%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%

BAESY

1D
-4.00%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
11.25%
6M
13.51%
1Y
0.44%
3Y*
30.63%
5Y*
30.61%
10Y*
18.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

T vs. BAESY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
11.25%65.51%1.23%40.91%46.40%14.56%-3.43%34.69%-22.16%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between T and BAESY is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.24

The correlation between T and BAESY shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

T:

$3.04

BAESY:

£5.29

PE Ratio

T:

7.74

BAESY:

14.41

PEG Ratio

T:

0.32

BAESY:

2.65

PS Ratio

T:

1.35

BAESY:

1.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

T:

$125.65B

BAESY:

£54.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

T:

$105.41B

BAESY:

£19.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

T:

$54.70B

BAESY:

£7.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

T vs. BAESY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BAESY
BAESY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BAESY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAESY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAESY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BAESY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAESY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

T vs. BAESY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and BAE Systems PLC (BAESY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBAESYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.03

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

0.02

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

0.04

-1.26

T vs. BAESY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current T Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the BAESY Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of T and BAESY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

T vs. BAESY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, which is greater than BAESY's maximum drawdown of -59.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and BAESY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBAESYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.15%

-59.20%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.87%

-23.59%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

-23.59%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

-23.59%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

-42.13%

-0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.12%

-16.92%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-19.32%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.64%

10.17%

+0.47%

Volatility

T vs. BAESY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AT&T Inc. (T) is 8.21%, while BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that T experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAESY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBAESYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

10.68%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.80%

25.10%

-7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.13%

31.92%

-9.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.01%

28.12%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.73%

27.90%

-4.17%

Dividends

T vs. BAESY - Dividend Comparison

T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than BAESY's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
1.90%1.90%2.79%2.40%3.09%4.46%7.05%3.66%4.93%5.71%6.26%4.38%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

T vs. BAESY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and BAE Systems PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
33.47B
14.67B
(T) Total Revenue
(BAESY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. T values in USD, BAESY values in GBP

Frequently Asked Questions


T and BAESY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAESY has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs BAESY's -59.20%.

BAESY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for T and BAESY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer