PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
T vs. AJG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

T vs. AJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. (T) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -7.04% return, which is significantly lower than AJG's -1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed AJG with an annualized return of 2.10%, while AJG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.74% annualized return.


T

1D
0.64%
1M
2.62%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.04%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
2.10%
ALL TIME*
9.35%

AJG

1D
-0.09%
1M
18.50%
6M
-1.25%
YTD
-1.36%
1Y
-18.08%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
13.67%
10Y*
19.74%
ALL TIME*
12.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

T vs. AJG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-1.36%-8.03%27.34%20.51%12.44%39.02%32.12%31.79%19.19%25.04%

Correlation

The correlation between T and AJG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984

0.22

The correlation between T and AJG shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

T:

$152.52B

AJG:

$65.18B

EPS

T:

$3.05

AJG:

$5.74

PE Ratio

T:

7.19

AJG:

44.21

PEG Ratio

T:

0.30

AJG:

4.58

PS Ratio

T:

1.25

AJG:

4.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

T:

$125.65B

AJG:

$13.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

T:

$105.41B

AJG:

$7.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

T:

$54.70B

AJG:

$3.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

T vs. AJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

T vs. AJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAJGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.91

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

-0.47

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

-0.79

-0.25

T vs. AJG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current T Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is comparable to the AJG Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of T and AJG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

T vs. AJG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, which is greater than AJG's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and AJG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAJGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.15%

-57.49%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.89%

-38.59%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.89%

-44.40%

+15.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

-44.40%

+12.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

-44.40%

+2.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.57%

-26.31%

+4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-12.87%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.94%

23.05%

-10.11%

Volatility

T vs. AJG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AT&T Inc. (T) is 9.59%, while Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that T experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAJGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

10.92%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

24.11%

-4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.72%

29.72%

-6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.38%

23.42%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

23.24%

+0.68%

Dividends

T vs. AJG - Dividend Comparison

T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than AJG's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.06%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%
T
AT&T Inc.
6.58%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

T vs. AJG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
33.47B
3.63B
(T) Total Revenue
(AJG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


T and AJG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJG has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to T (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs AJG's -57.49%.

T currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for T and AJG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer