SZNE vs. TRFK
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZNE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
SZNE vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SZNE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRFK
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 55.79%
- YTD
- 56.79%
- 1Y
- 69.46%
- 3Y*
- 47.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SZNE vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | 2.05% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 56.79% | 26.81% | 38.30% | 66.63% | -10.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and TRFK is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SZNE and TRFK has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SZNE vs. TRFK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
TRFK
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
SZNE
TRFK
-
Industrials
SZNE
TRFK
Energy
SZNE
TRFK
-
Technology
SZNE
TRFK
Healthcare
SZNE
TRFK
-
Utilities
SZNE
TRFK
-
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
TRFK
-
Communication Services
SZNE
TRFK
Real Estate
SZNE
TRFK
Basic Materials
SZNE
TRFK
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
TRFK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRFK
SZNE vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SZNE | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -29.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -9.65% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.07% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.57% | — |
Volatility
SZNE vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 33.93% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 30.26% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 30.26% | — |
SZNE vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SZNE and TRFK have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
SZNE vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.20% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and TRFK have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SZNE and TRFK have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.
SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TRFK is Technology Equities. SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and TRFK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer