PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZNE vs. PTNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZNE vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SZNE

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

PTNQ

1D
0.62%
1M
-3.51%
6M
4.32%
YTD
5.52%
1Y
16.96%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
14.82%
ALL TIME*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.10M$2.47M$2.76M

SZNE vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
9.68%-3.44%2.05%6.53%-12.33%26.36%4.03%35.75%-7.01%
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
5.52%7.18%15.47%34.65%-16.00%13.16%29.38%24.00%-5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and PTNQ is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2018

0.56

The correlation between SZNE and PTNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZNE vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SZNE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PTNQ
PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SZNE vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SZNEPTNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

SZNE vs. PTNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZNEPTNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

Volatility

SZNE vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZNEPTNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

SZNE vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SZNE vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than PTNQ's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
0.84%0.88%1.96%1.47%0.62%0.00%0.16%0.44%0.45%0.32%0.30%0.22%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.23%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZNE and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SZNE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SZNE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.

SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.84% for PTNQ.

SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.65% for PTNQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZNE and PTNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer