SZNE vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZNE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

SZNE vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SZNE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZNE vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF	9.68%	-3.44%	2.05%	8.07%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.39%	4.96%	5.25%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and IBIC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	-0.00

Return for Risk

SZNE vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZNE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZNE vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SZNE	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.94	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	8.90	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	16.41	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	58.11	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SZNE	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.90%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.11%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.10%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SZNE	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.89%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	1.57%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	1.57%	—

SZNE vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

SZNE vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF	1.23%	1.47%	1.20%	1.21%	1.11%	0.79%	1.37%	0.90%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SZNE and IBIC in my portfolio?

SZNE and IBIC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SZNE or IBIC?

On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SZNE or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SZNE or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.23% for SZNE.

What is the main difference between SZNE and IBIC?

SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.10% for IBIC.