SZNE vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SZNE is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

SZNE vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SZNE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 9.68%
• 6M: 10.88%
• 1Y: 13.01%
• 3Y*: 3.38%
• 5Y*: 1.44%
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZNE vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF	0.00%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

SZNE vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SZNE	GRW
Consumer Cyclical	29.7%	8.3%
Technology	25.3%	26.6%
Industrials	23.6%	38.1%
Basic Materials	20.3%	4.0%
Communication Services	0.5%	9.1%
Energy	0.3%	-
Utilities	0.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	9.8%
Healthcare	-	4.1%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

SZNE vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZNE

SZNE Risk / Return Rank: 31
SZNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SZNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SZNE Omega Ratio Rank: 29
SZNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SZNE Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZNE vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SZNE	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SZNE	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	13.58	-13.24

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SZNE	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.79%	-0.45%	-39.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-0.27%	-0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.33%	-0.17%	-7.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SZNE	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.80%	8.89%	+5.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	8.89%	+8.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.10%	8.89%	+11.21%

SZNE vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SZNE vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF	1.37%	1.47%	1.20%	1.21%	1.11%	0.79%	1.37%	0.90%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, SZNE or GRW?

On fees, SZNE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SZNE or GRW?

SZNE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SZNE or GRW?

SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between SZNE and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.75% for GRW.