SZNE vs. COWG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and COWG (Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZNE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while COWG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWG.

Performance

SZNE vs. COWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SZNE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

COWG

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -2.55%
• 6M: 7.42%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 1Y: 10.38%
• 3Y*: 19.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	$10.58M	$10.02M	$10.58M

SZNE vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF	9.68%	-3.44%	2.05%	6.53%	-0.94%
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	7.76%	10.24%	34.99%	20.69%	-0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and COWG is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022	0.62

The correlation between SZNE and COWG shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SZNE vs. COWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SZNE	COWG
Technology	19.4%	59.8%
Financial Services	8.1%	-
Industrials	7.8%	3.1%
Healthcare	5.1%	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	2.7%
Energy	3.8%	6.7%
Communication Services	3.7%	8.6%
Real Estate	2.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	2.7%
Basic Materials	1.8%	3.4%
Utilities	1.0%	1.4%

Return for Risk

SZNE vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SZNE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COWG

COWG Risk / Return Rank: 24
COWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
COWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
COWG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
COWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
COWG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SZNE vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SZNE	COWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.50	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.81	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.10	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.26	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SZNE	COWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-23.60%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.79%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.60%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.30%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SZNE	COWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.45%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.42%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	18.07%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.33%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	19.33%	—

SZNE vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SZNE vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than COWG's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.37%	0.32%	0.40%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF	1.23%	1.47%	1.20%	1.21%	1.11%	0.79%	1.37%	0.90%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SZNE and COWG in my portfolio?

SZNE and COWG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SZNE or COWG?

On fees, COWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SZNE or COWG?

COWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SZNE or COWG?

SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.37% for COWG.

What is the main difference between SZNE and COWG?

SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while COWG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while COWG tracks Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.49% for COWG.