PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZNE vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZNE vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SZNE

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COMT

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.53%
6M
26.18%
YTD
30.19%
1Y
33.20%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
8.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZNE vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
9.68%-3.44%2.05%6.53%-12.33%26.36%4.03%35.75%-7.01%
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
30.19%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%-18.66%10.81%-11.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and COMT is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2018

0.19

The correlation between SZNE and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZNE vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZNE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZNE vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SZNECOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.35

SZNE vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZNECOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

Volatility

SZNE vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZNECOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

SZNE vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SZNE vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than COMT's 5.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
5.95%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.23%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZNE and COMT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 1.23% for SZNE.

SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while COMT is Commodities. SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.48% for COMT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZNE and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer