SZNE vs. AFOS
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
SZNE vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SZNE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 24.15%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 1Y
- 72.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SZNE vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | 3.38% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 31.41% | 37.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and AFOS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AFOS
SZNE vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SZNE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.54 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 28.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -11.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.93% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.52% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.61% | — |
Volatility
SZNE vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 21.99% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.70% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.70% | — |
SZNE vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZNE vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than AFOS's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and AFOS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.
SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.23% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer