SZK vs. NBIG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SZK is passively managed, while NBIG is actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SZK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.

Performance

SZK vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -10.17% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 487.61% return.

SZK

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: -10.17%
• 6M: -9.09%
• 1Y: 1.57%
• 3Y*: -4.63%
• 5Y*: -3.38%
• 10Y*: -15.99%

NBIG

• 1D: 6.23%
• 1M: 96.57%
• YTD: 487.61%
• 6M: 268.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZK vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods	-10.17%	3.46%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	487.61%	-62.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SZK and NBIG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.18

Return for Risk

SZK vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZK

SZK Risk / Return Rank: 10
SZK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Omega Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZK vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SZK	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.06	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.05	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.12	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SZK	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.59	1.38	-1.97

Drawdowns

SZK vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SZK	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-75.83%	-23.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.24%	-3.94%	-95.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.00%	-42.82%	-39.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SZK	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.97%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.19%	200.64%	-175.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.44%	200.64%	-169.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.60%	200.64%	-167.04%

SZK vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SZK vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods	2.64%	2.90%	5.70%	4.03%	0.56%	0.00%	0.19%	1.70%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SZK and NBIG in my portfolio?

SZK and NBIG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SZK or NBIG?

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SZK or NBIG?

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SZK or NBIG?

SZK has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.

What is the main difference between SZK and NBIG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.75% for NBIG.