SZK vs. BRKW
SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZK is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while BRKW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. SZK is passively managed, while BRKW is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. SZK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKW.
Performance
SZK vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -9.91% return, which is significantly lower than BRKW's -7.76% return.
SZK
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- -9.91%
- 6M
- -7.73%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- -4.29%
- 5Y*
- -3.68%
- 10Y*
- -16.07%
BRKW
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- -7.76%
- 6M
- -8.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SZK vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | -9.91% | 7.93% |
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | -7.76% | 2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZK and BRKW is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZK vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank
SZK
BRKW
SZK vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZK | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.13 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.37 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.26 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZK | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | -0.36 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
SZK vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and BRKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZK | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -12.64% | -86.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.24% | -10.70% | -88.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -5.34% | -76.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.83% | — | — |
Volatility
SZK vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZK | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.18% | 17.23% | +7.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.45% | 17.23% | +14.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.61% | 17.23% | +16.38% |
SZK vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZK vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison
SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than BRKW's 25.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | 25.19% | 14.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | 2.63% | 2.90% | 5.70% | 4.03% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.70% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZK and BRKW have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SZK is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SZK is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.
BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 25.19%, compared with 2.63% for SZK.
SZK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BRKW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.99% for BRKW.
Find the right allocation for SZK and BRKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer