SZK vs. BIDG

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and BIDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SZK tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%) while BIDG tracks the Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). Both are passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SZK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BIDG.

Performance

SZK vs. BIDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -15.40% return, which is significantly higher than BIDG's -47.16% return.

SZK

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: -15.40%
• 6M: -13.95%
• 1Y: -7.92%
• 3Y*: -5.88%
• 5Y*: -4.06%
• 10Y*: -16.93%

BIDG

• 1D: -7.34%
• 1M: -35.13%
• YTD: -47.16%
• 6M: -40.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZK vs. BIDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods	-15.40%	4.30%
BIDG Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF	-47.16%	17.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SZK and BIDG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

SZK vs. BIDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZK

SZK Risk / Return Rank: 7
SZK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SZK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SZK Omega Ratio Rank: 6
SZK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SZK Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BIDG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZK vs. BIDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SZK	BIDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.31	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.58	—	—

Drawdowns

SZK vs. BIDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than BIDG's maximum drawdown of -64.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and BIDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SZK	BIDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-64.84%	-34.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.28%	-64.84%	-34.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.03%	-34.77%	-47.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SZK	BIDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.99%	102.33%	-76.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.58%	102.33%	-70.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.63%	102.33%	-68.70%

SZK vs. BIDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BIDG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SZK vs. BIDG - Dividend Comparison

SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, while BIDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BIDG Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods	2.72%	2.90%	5.70%	4.03%	0.56%	0.00%	0.19%	1.70%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SZK and BIDG in my portfolio?

SZK and BIDG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SZK or BIDG?

On fees, BIDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SZK or BIDG?

BIDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SZK or BIDG?

SZK has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.00% for BIDG.

What is the main difference between SZK and BIDG?

SZK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while BIDG tracks Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.75% for BIDG.