PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZK vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZK vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 391.03% return.


SZK

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.66%
YTD
-10.45%
6M
-8.35%
1Y
2.69%
3Y*
-4.48%
5Y*
-3.44%
10Y*
-16.12%

AMDG

1D
7.70%
1M
134.89%
YTD
391.03%
6M
367.32%
1Y
1,172.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZK vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SZK and AMDG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZK vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZK
SZK Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SZK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SZK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SZK Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SZK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SZK Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZK vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SZKAMDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.63

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

20.99

-20.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.21

41.10

-40.89

SZK vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SZK Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 9.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SZK and AMDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SZKAMDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

9.15

-9.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.59

3.36

-3.95

Drawdowns

SZK vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and AMDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZKAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-63.04%

-36.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.26%

-56.48%

+27.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.24%

0.00%

-99.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.99%

-25.70%

-56.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.87%

28.80%

-15.93%

Volatility

SZK vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) is 8.10%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 45.35%. This indicates that SZK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZKAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

45.35%

-37.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.99%

94.94%

-74.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.19%

129.64%

-104.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.45%

130.26%

-98.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.60%

130.26%

-96.66%

SZK vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SZK vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than AMDG's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
2.28%11.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SZK
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods
2.65%2.90%5.70%4.03%0.56%0.00%0.19%1.70%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZK and AMDG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDG has higher volatility (45.35%) compared to SZK (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZK dropped -99.40% vs AMDG's -63.04%.

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 1172.87% vs 2.69% for SZK. On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SZK has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 1172.87% return vs 2.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.

SZK has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 2.28% for AMDG.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.75% for AMDG.

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.15 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZK and AMDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer