SYSB vs. NBIS
SYSB (iShares Systematic Bond ETF) is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the BlackRock Universal Systematic Bond Index, while NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) is a stock. Over the past year, SYSB returned 2.56% vs 266.17% for NBIS. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SYSB vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYSB achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 127.48% return.
SYSB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- 2.56%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.28%
NBIS
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -11.69%
- 6M
- 123.51%
- YTD
- 127.48%
- 1Y
- 266.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 265.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.73B | $4.16B | $4.21B | |
| $4.79M | $5.34M | $7.44M |
SYSB vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SYSB iShares Systematic Bond ETF | -0.64% | 8.32% | 0.24% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 127.48% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYSB and NBIS is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYSB vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
SYSB
NBIS
SYSB vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Systematic Bond ETF (SYSB) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SYSB | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.34 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 5.21 | -4.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.61 | 11.53 | -8.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SYSB vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYSB drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum NBIS drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYSB and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYSB | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.47% | -58.27% | +39.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -48.30% | +45.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -33.58% | +31.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -19.18% | +15.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 21.79% | -20.60% |
Volatility
SYSB vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Systematic Bond ETF (SYSB) is 1.06%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 45.48%. This indicates that SYSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYSB | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 45.48% | -44.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.18% | 83.51% | -80.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.06% | 113.57% | -109.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.66% | 113.26% | -107.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 113.26% | -108.33% |
Dividends
SYSB vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
SYSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while NBIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SYSB iShares Systematic Bond ETF | 4.21% | 4.78% | 5.04% | 4.44% | 3.27% | 1.92% | 2.57% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 2.74% | 2.92% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYSB and NBIS have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (45.48%) compared to SYSB (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYSB dropped -18.47% vs NBIS's -58.27%.
NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYSB and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer