SYK vs. SMH
SYK (Stryker Corporation) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, SYK returned 11.77%/yr vs 35.15%/yr for SMH. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SYK vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYK achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 57.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SYK has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 11.77%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 35.15% annualized return.
SYK
- 1D
- 4.66%
- 1M
- 6.92%
- 6M
- -8.14%
- YTD
- -5.26%
- 1Y
- -14.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
SMH
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- 6M
- 43.52%
- YTD
- 57.98%
- 1Y
- 97.28%
- 3Y*
- 53.38%
- 5Y*
- 36.57%
- 10Y*
- 35.15%
SYK vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYK Stryker Corporation | -5.26% | -1.48% | 21.34% | 23.80% | -7.42% | 10.22% | 18.17% | 35.33% | 2.43% | 30.84% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 57.98% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYK and SMH is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.38 |
The correlation between SYK and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYK vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
SYK
SMH
SYK vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stryker Corporation (SYK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SYK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.41 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 6.54 | -7.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 20.41 | -21.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SYK vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYK drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYK and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -84.96% | +26.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.45% | -14.95% | -14.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.45% | -35.74% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.68% | -45.30% | +13.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.80% | -45.30% | +1.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.09% | -14.95% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.13% | -40.93% | +27.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.86% | 4.78% | +9.08% |
Volatility
SYK vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Stryker Corporation (SYK) is 12.61%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.01%. This indicates that SYK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.61% | 17.01% | -4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.51% | 31.61% | -10.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.66% | 36.97% | -11.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.82% | 36.21% | -11.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.61% | 33.16% | -6.55% |
Dividends
SYK vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
SYK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
SYK Stryker Corporation | 1.05% | 0.97% | 0.90% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 0.97% | 0.96% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYK and SMH have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to SYK (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYK dropped -58.63% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYK and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer