SYFI vs. SIBAX
SYFI (AB Short Duration High Yield ETF) and SIBAX (SIT Balanced Fund) are both funds - SYFI is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while SIBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Sit. Over the past year, SYFI returned 6.18% vs 16.72% for SIBAX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SYFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for SIBAX.
Performance
SYFI vs. SIBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYFI achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than SIBAX's 3.33% return.
SYFI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIBAX
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
SYFI vs. SIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SYFI AB Short Duration High Yield ETF | 1.86% | 7.19% | 5.12% |
SIBAX SIT Balanced Fund | 3.33% | 13.57% | 8.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYFI and SIBAX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SYFI and SIBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYFI vs. SIBAX — Risk / Return Rank
SYFI
SIBAX
SYFI vs. SIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Short Duration High Yield ETF (SYFI) and SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SYFI | SIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 1.93 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.54 | 7.61 | +6.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SYFI vs. SIBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYFI drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, smaller than the maximum SIBAX drawdown of -40.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYFI and SIBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYFI | SIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -40.93% | +36.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.94% | -8.51% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -2.00% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -7.74% | +7.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 2.15% | -1.72% |
Volatility
SYFI vs. SIBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Short Duration High Yield ETF (SYFI) is 0.83%, while SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that SYFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYFI | SIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 3.56% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 7.76% | -5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23% | 9.82% | -6.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 12.55% | -8.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 12.26% | -8.05% |
SYFI vs. SIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SIBAX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYFI vs. SIBAX - Dividend Comparison
SYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than SIBAX's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIBAX SIT Balanced Fund | 3.25% | 3.39% | 2.46% | 1.36% | 4.93% | 4.02% | 1.55% | 6.37% | 2.05% | 5.20% | 1.62% | 6.53% |
SYFI AB Short Duration High Yield ETF | 6.11% | 6.20% | 3.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYFI and SIBAX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIBAX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to SYFI (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYFI dropped -4.49% vs SIBAX's -40.93%.
SYFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYFI and SIBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer