PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYF vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SYF vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Synchrony Financial (SYF) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYF achieves a -11.29% return, which is significantly lower than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SYF has outperformed T with an annualized return of 12.56%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


SYF

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.46%
6M
-7.71%
YTD
-11.29%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
31.18%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
12.56%
ALL TIME*
12.35%

T

1D
0.64%
1M
2.62%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.04%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
2.10%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYF vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYF
Synchrony Financial
-11.29%30.64%74.01%19.76%-27.43%36.40%-0.08%57.48%-37.84%8.35%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SYF and T is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2014

0.29

The correlation between SYF and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SYF:

$24.69B

T:

$152.52B

EPS

SYF:

$9.97

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

SYF:

7.36

T:

7.19

PEG Ratio

SYF:

0.70

T:

0.30

PS Ratio

SYF:

1.33

T:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

SYF:

$19.92B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SYF:

$12.16B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

SYF:

$4.94B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYF vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYF
SYF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYF vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Synchrony Financial (SYF) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SYFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.92

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

-0.46

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.49

-1.03

+1.53

SYF vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYF Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYF and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SYF vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYF drawdown since its inception was -66.37%, roughly equal to the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYF and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.37%

-64.15%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.61%

-28.89%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.75%

-28.89%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.65%

-32.01%

-14.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.37%

-42.35%

-24.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.35%

-21.57%

+5.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-15.74%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.29%

12.94%

+0.35%

Volatility

SYF vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Synchrony Financial (SYF) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 9.59%. This indicates that SYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.90%

9.59%

+3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.71%

19.91%

+4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.26%

23.72%

+7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.88%

24.38%

+12.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.39%

23.92%

+15.47%

Dividends

SYF vs. T - Dividend Comparison

SYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than T's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SYF
Synchrony Financial
1.63%1.38%1.54%2.51%2.74%1.90%2.54%2.39%3.07%1.45%0.72%0.00%
T
AT&T Inc.
6.58%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

SYF vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Synchrony Financial and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.60B
33.47B
(SYF) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SYF and T have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SYF has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to T (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYF dropped -66.37% vs T's -64.15%.

SYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYF and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer