PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRV.DE vs. SXQG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRV.DE vs. SXQG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) and ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXRV.DE is traded in EUR, while SXQG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SXQG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRV.DE achieves a 20.57% return, which is significantly higher than SXQG's -0.63% return.


SXRV.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
7.99%
YTD
20.57%
6M
18.73%
1Y
37.06%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
21.24%

SXQG

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.59%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
-2.28%
1Y
-0.96%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRV.DE vs. SXQG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SXRV.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
20.57%6.98%33.55%51.19%-30.05%33.36%
SXQG
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF
-0.63%-7.96%26.61%24.47%-19.21%20.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRV.DE and SXQG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021

0.55

The correlation between SXRV.DE and SXQG shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRV.DE vs. SXQG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRV.DE
SXRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SXQG
SXQG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SXQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXQG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SXQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXQG Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRV.DE vs. SXQG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) and ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXRV.DESXQGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.00

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

-0.07

+3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

-0.18

+11.34

SXRV.DE vs. SXQG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the SXQG Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRV.DE and SXQG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXRV.DESXQGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

-0.08

+2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.38

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.39

+0.52

Drawdowns

SXRV.DE vs. SXQG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRV.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.80%, which is greater than SXQG's maximum drawdown of -29.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRV.DE and SXQG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRV.DESXQGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.80%

-29.20%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-13.01%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.69%

-24.55%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.33%

-29.20%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-12.58%

+11.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-10.19%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

5.24%

-1.86%

Volatility

SXRV.DE vs. SXQG - Volatility Comparison

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) at 3.29%. This indicates that SXRV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXQG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRV.DESXQGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

3.29%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

9.06%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

12.22%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.84%

17.94%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

17.89%

+1.76%

SXRV.DE vs. SXQG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRV.DE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than SXQG's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXRV.DE vs. SXQG - Dividend Comparison

SXRV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SXQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
SXQG
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF
0.07%0.15%0.00%0.02%0.09%0.00%
SXRV.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRV.DE and SXQG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRV.DE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRV.DE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SXQG.

SXRV.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SXQG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Meridian. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SXRV.DE and 1.00% for SXQG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRV.DE and SXQG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer