SXRV.DE vs. CNDX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L).
SXRV.DE and CNDX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SXRV.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. CNDX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both SXRV.DE and CNDX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SXRV.DE or CNDX.L.
Key characteristics
| SXRV.DE | CNDX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 30.59% | 24.90% |
| 1Y Return | 37.32% | 33.70% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.29% | 9.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 21.70% | 20.91% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 19.90% | 18.12% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.27 | 2.09 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.00 | 2.82 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.80 | 2.76 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.25 | 9.70 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.06% | 3.50% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.42% | 16.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.39% | -35.17% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXRV.DE and CNDX.L is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SXRV.DE vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SXRV.DE achieves a 30.59% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.L's 24.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SXRV.DE has outperformed CNDX.L with an annualized return of 19.90%, while CNDX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 18.12% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SXRV.DE vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXRV.DE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SXRV.DE vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SXRV.DE vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
SXRV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNDX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXRV.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
SXRV.DE vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXRV.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.39%, smaller than the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRV.DE and CNDX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SXRV.DE vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) is 4.51%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that SXRV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.