PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR4.DE vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXR4.DE vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXR4.DE is traded in EUR, while VTI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VTI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SXR4.DE having a 11.29% return and VTI slightly lower at 10.86%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SXR4.DE having a 14.76% annualized return and VTI not far behind at 14.54%.


SXR4.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
5.37%
YTD
11.29%
6M
11.25%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
14.32%
10Y*
14.76%

VTI

1D
-1.90%
1M
2.40%
YTD
10.86%
6M
9.43%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
13.41%
10Y*
14.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXR4.DE vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXR4.DE
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc)
11.29%4.62%32.33%23.44%-15.85%38.32%9.25%34.28%-1.46%6.54%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.86%3.20%31.98%22.27%-14.54%35.08%11.10%33.62%-0.79%6.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SXR4.DE and VTI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.61

The correlation between SXR4.DE and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXR4.DE vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR4.DE
SXR4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SXR4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR4.DE vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXR4.DEVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.40

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

12.71

-0.80

SXR4.DE vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR4.DE and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXR4.DEVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.01

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.78

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.78

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.61

+0.17

Drawdowns

SXR4.DE vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR4.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -50.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR4.DE and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR4.DEVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.16%

-50.14%

+15.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.36%

-7.45%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.63%

-24.34%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-24.34%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.16%

-34.51%

+0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-2.01%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-7.70%

+2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

1.99%

+0.12%

Volatility

SXR4.DE vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) is 2.73%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that SXR4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXR4.DEVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

3.04%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.68%

8.95%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.70%

12.61%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

17.23%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

18.76%

-2.53%

SXR4.DE vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXR4.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXR4.DE vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

SXR4.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SXR4.DE
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXR4.DE and VTI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SXR4.DE.

SXR4.DE tracks MSCI USA, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SXR4.DE and 0.03% for VTI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXR4.DE and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer