SXQG vs. SPIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SXQG (ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SXQG charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.

Performance

SXQG vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXQG achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 27.30% return.

SXQG

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.93%
• 6M: -2.39%
• YTD: -2.19%
• 1Y: 0.39%
• 3Y*: 9.52%
• 5Y*: 4.57%
• 10Y*: —

SPIT

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 18.89%
• YTD: 27.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXQG vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF	-2.19%	-1.11%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	27.30%	5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SXQG and SPIT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

SXQG vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXQG

SXQG Risk / Return Rank: 9
SXQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
SXQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
SXQG Omega Ratio Rank: 9
SXQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SXQG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

SPIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXQG vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SXQG	SPIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.07	—	—

Drawdowns

SXQG vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXQG drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXQG and SPIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SXQG	SPIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.97%	-12.49%	-21.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.05%	-5.43%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.04%	-2.51%	-7.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.32%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SXQG	SPIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.89%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.04%	26.39%	-14.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.06%	26.39%	-8.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.91%	26.39%	-8.48%

SXQG vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXQG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SXQG vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

SXQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than SPIT's 5.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	5.64%	7.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF	0.03%	0.15%	0.00%	0.02%	0.09%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SXQG and SPIT in my portfolio?

SXQG and SPIT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SXQG or SPIT?

On fees, SPIT is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SXQG or SPIT?

SPIT is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SXQG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SXQG or SPIT?

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 0.03% for SXQG.

What is the main difference between SXQG and SPIT?

They also come from different issuers: Meridian and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SXQG and 0.89% for SPIT.