SXQG vs. SGRT
SXQG (ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SXQG charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
SXQG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXQG achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 48.90% return.
SXQG
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- -1.65%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 0.31%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 48.90%
- 6M
- 51.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SXQG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | -1.65% | -0.35% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 48.90% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXQG and SGRT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXQG vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
SXQG
SGRT
SXQG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXQG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXQG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 3.63 | -3.30 |
Drawdowns
SXQG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXQG drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXQG and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXQG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -17.87% | -16.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -1.69% | -2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -3.10% | -7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | — | — |
Volatility
SXQG vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXQG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.72% | 33.40% | -21.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 33.40% | -15.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 33.40% | -15.43% |
SXQG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXQG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXQG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
SXQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SXQG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SXQG.
SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.07% for SXQG.
Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SXQG and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for SXQG and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer