SXQG vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SXQG (ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SXQG charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

SXQG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXQG achieves a -7.42% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 49.54% return.

SXQG

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -7.42%
• 6M: -8.57%
• 1Y: -4.01%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: 3.81%
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: 2.19%
• YTD: 49.54%
• 6M: 44.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXQG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF	-7.42%	-0.30%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	49.54%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SXQG and SGRT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

SXQG vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXQG

SXQG Risk / Return Rank: 6
SXQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
SXQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SXQG Omega Ratio Rank: 6
SXQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SXQG Martin Ratio Rank: 6

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXQG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SXQG	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.77	—	—

Drawdowns

SXQG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXQG drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXQG and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SXQG	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.97%	-17.87%	-16.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.14%	-2.68%	-7.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.07%	-3.23%	-6.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SXQG	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.76%	35.38%	-23.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.03%	35.38%	-17.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.93%	35.38%	-17.45%

SXQG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXQG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SXQG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

SXQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SGRT's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF	0.07%	0.15%	0.00%	0.02%	0.09%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SXQG and SGRT in my portfolio?

SXQG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SXQG or SGRT?

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SXQG or SGRT?

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SXQG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SXQG or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.07% for SXQG.

What is the main difference between SXQG and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SXQG and 0.59% for SGRT.