SXQG vs. QQQA
SXQG (ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF) and QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SXQG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Meridian, while QQQA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. SXQG is actively managed, while QQQA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SXQG returned 5.81%/yr vs 14.57%/yr for QQQA. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SXQG charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QQQA.
Performance
SXQG vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXQG achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 64.12% return.
SXQG
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- -1.65%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 0.31%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQA
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 19.04%
- YTD
- 64.12%
- 6M
- 67.24%
- 1Y
- 86.88%
- 3Y*
- 34.14%
- 5Y*
- 14.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SXQG vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | -1.65% | 4.43% | 18.77% | 28.32% | -23.93% | 12.45% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 64.12% | 9.87% | 16.17% | 24.98% | -29.08% | 8.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXQG and QQQA is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SXQG and QQQA has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SXQG vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXQG
QQQA
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SXQG
QQQA
Communication Services
SXQG
QQQA
Healthcare
SXQG
QQQA
Consumer Defensive
SXQG
QQQA
-
Financial Services
SXQG
QQQA
-
Consumer Cyclical
SXQG
QQQA
Industrials
SXQG
QQQA
-
Energy
SXQG
QQQA
Basic Materials
SXQG
QQQA
-
Real Estate
SXQG
-
QQQA
-
Utilities
SXQG
-
QQQA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXQG vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank
SXQG
QQQA
SXQG vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXQG | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.53 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 6.01 | -5.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 22.45 | -22.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXQG | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 3.35 | -3.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.57 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.58 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
SXQG vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXQG drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum QQQA drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXQG and QQQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXQG | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -38.44% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -14.54% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | -30.84% | +11.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.97% | -38.44% | +4.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -0.76% | -3.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -15.66% | +5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 3.88% | +1.04% |
Volatility
SXQG vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) is 3.22%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that SXQG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXQG | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 10.13% | -6.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 22.18% | -13.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.72% | 26.07% | -14.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 25.82% | -7.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 25.76% | -7.79% |
SXQG vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXQG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXQG vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison
SXQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.06% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% |
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SXQG and QQQA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQA has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to SXQG (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXQG dropped -33.97% vs QQQA's -38.44%.
On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.57% vs 5.81% for SXQG. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SXQG has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.57% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SXQG.
SXQG has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.
SXQG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Meridian and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SXQG and 0.58% for QQQA.
QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SXQG and QQQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer