SXQG vs. IBIC
SXQG (ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SXQG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Meridian, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. SXQG is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, SXQG returned -0.30% vs 4.60% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. SXQG charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
SXQG vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXQG achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.37% return.
SXQG
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- -3.29%
- 1Y
- -0.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.22%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SXQG vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | -2.55% | 4.43% | 18.77% | 10.52% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.37% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXQG and IBIC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | -0.06 |
The correlation between SXQG and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXQG vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
SXQG
IBIC
SXQG vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXQG | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 2.28 | -1.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 17.50 | -17.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 67.61 | -67.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXQG | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 5.14 | -5.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 3.48 | -3.16 |
Drawdowns
SXQG vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXQG drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXQG and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXQG | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -0.90% | -33.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -0.26% | -13.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | -0.13% | -5.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -0.10% | -10.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 0.07% | +4.86% |
Volatility
SXQG vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.31%. This indicates that SXQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXQG | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 0.31% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | 0.67% | +8.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.75% | 0.90% | +10.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 1.57% | +16.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 1.57% | +16.40% |
SXQG vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXQG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXQG vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
SXQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SXQG and IBIC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SXQG has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to IBIC (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXQG dropped -33.97% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.60% vs -0.30% for SXQG. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.60% return vs -0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SXQG.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.07% for SXQG.
SXQG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Meridian and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SXQG and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.14 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SXQG and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer