PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXC vs. METCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SXC vs. METCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) and Ramaco Resources Inc. (METCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXC achieves a 19.84% return, which is significantly higher than METCB's -18.59% return.


SXC

1D
-3.13%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
19.84%
6M
20.68%
1Y
11.66%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
7.13%

METCB

1D
-3.21%
1M
-6.51%
YTD
-18.59%
6M
-9.76%
1Y
25.43%
3Y*
0.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXC vs. METCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SXC
SunCoke Energy, Inc.
19.84%-28.61%3.95%35.95%
METCB
Ramaco Resources Inc.
-18.59%25.90%-17.35%55.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SXC and METCB is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023

0.36

The correlation between SXC and METCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

SXC:

-$0.77

METCB:

-$0.96

PS Ratio

SXC:

0.39

METCB:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

SXC:

$1.86B

METCB:

$523.58M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SXC:

$114.40M

METCB:

-$7.12M

EBITDA (TTM)

SXC:

$98.50M

METCB:

$724.00K

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SunCoke Energy, Inc.

Ramaco Resources Inc.

Return for Risk

SXC vs. METCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXC
SXC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

METCB
METCB Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
METCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
METCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
METCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
METCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXC vs. METCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) and Ramaco Resources Inc. (METCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXCMETCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.12

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

0.45

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

0.69

+0.05

SXC vs. METCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXC Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is comparable to the METCB Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXC and METCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXC vs. METCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXC drawdown since its inception was -90.41%, which is greater than METCB's maximum drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXC and METCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXCMETCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.41%

-56.34%

-34.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.60%

-56.34%

+23.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.99%

-56.34%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.84%

-55.86%

+6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.79%

-29.53%

-19.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.75%

36.93%

-21.18%

Volatility

SXC vs. METCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) is 13.49%, while Ramaco Resources Inc. (METCB) has a volatility of 23.17%. This indicates that SXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXCMETCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.49%

23.17%

-9.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.69%

47.21%

-15.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.53%

80.59%

-37.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.28%

66.30%

-26.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.79%

66.30%

-13.51%

Dividends

SXC vs. METCB - Dividend Comparison

SXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, while METCB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
METCB
Ramaco Resources Inc.
0.00%3.18%9.36%3.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SXC
SunCoke Energy, Inc.
5.73%6.67%4.11%3.35%3.24%3.64%5.52%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.48%

Financials

SXC vs. METCB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SunCoke Energy, Inc. and Ramaco Resources Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
455.10M
121.61M
(SXC) Total Revenue
(METCB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SXC vs. METCB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SunCoke Energy, Inc. and Ramaco Resources Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
SXC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 455.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

METCB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SXC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.40M and revenue of 455.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

METCB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.0%.

SXC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -4.40M and revenue of 455.10M, resulting in a net margin of -1.0%.

METCB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported a net income of -18.32M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SXC and METCB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

METCB has higher volatility (23.17%) compared to SXC (13.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXC dropped -90.41% vs METCB's -56.34%.

METCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXC and METCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer