SXC vs. METC
SXC (SunCoke Energy, Inc.) and METC (Ramaco Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Coking Coal industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 5 years, SXC returned 6.63%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for METC. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SXC vs. METC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXC achieves a 21.42% return, which is significantly higher than METC's -44.63% return.
SXC
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- YTD
- 21.42%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- -0.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.07%
METC
- 1D
- -6.24%
- 1M
- -23.03%
- 6M
- -48.91%
- YTD
- -44.63%
- 1Y
- -47.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.86%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.38M | $18.24M | $21.50M | |
| $18.27M | $13.32M | $13.77M |
SXC vs. METC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXC SunCoke Energy, Inc. | 21.42% | -28.61% | 3.95% | 29.77% | 35.86% | 56.87% | -25.81% | -26.25% | -28.69% | 32.93% |
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | -44.63% | 94.40% | -37.24% | 105.93% | -32.97% | 372.22% | -19.55% | -27.68% | -28.05% | -52.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXC and METC is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | 0.42 |
The correlation between SXC and METC shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SXC:
$719.56M
METC:
$493.39M
SXC:
-$0.64
METC:
-$1.82
SXC:
0.38
METC:
0.58
SXC:
$1.90B
METC:
$523.58M
SXC:
$150.60M
METC:
$10.83M
SXC:
$130.50M
METC:
$723.00K
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXC vs. METC — Risk / Return Rank
SXC
METC
SXC vs. METC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SXC | METC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.95 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | -0.63 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | -0.83 | +2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SXC vs. METC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXC drawdown since its inception was -90.41%, roughly equal to the maximum METC drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXC and METC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXC | METC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.41% | -86.53% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.04% | -81.73% | +49.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.99% | -81.73% | +29.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.99% | -81.73% | +29.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.18% | -81.73% | +32.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.79% | -52.39% | +3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.02% | 61.24% | -46.22% |
Volatility
SXC vs. METC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) is 12.70%, while Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a volatility of 20.02%. This indicates that SXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXC | METC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.70% | 20.02% | -7.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.83% | 53.66% | -20.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.30% | 89.86% | -46.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.45% | 82.53% | -43.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.40% | 75.73% | -23.33% |
Dividends
SXC vs. METC - Dividend Comparison
SXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, less than METC's 11.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | 11.33% | 1.10% | 5.32% | 2.91% | 5.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SXC SunCoke Energy, Inc. | 5.66% | 6.67% | 4.11% | 3.35% | 3.24% | 3.64% | 5.52% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.48% |
Financials
SXC vs. METC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SunCoke Energy, Inc. and Ramaco Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SXC vs. METC - Profitability Comparison
SXC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.50M and revenue of 475.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.7%.
METC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SXC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 29.00M and revenue of 475.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.
METC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.0%.
SXC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 13.10M and revenue of 475.30M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
METC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -18.32M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXC and METC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METC has higher volatility (20.02%) compared to SXC (12.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXC dropped -90.41% vs METC's -86.53%.
SXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SXC and METC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer