SXC vs. BTU
SXC (SunCoke Energy, Inc.) and BTU (Peabody Energy Corporation) are both stocks. SXC operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials), while BTU operates in Thermal Coal (Energy). Over the past 5 years, SXC returned 6.63%/yr vs 13.74%/yr for BTU. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SXC vs. BTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXC achieves a 21.42% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's -27.83% return.
SXC
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- YTD
- 21.42%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- -0.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.07%
BTU
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- 6M
- -39.21%
- YTD
- -27.83%
- 1Y
- 34.27%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $64.45M | $57.10M | $82.42M | |
| $18.27M | $13.32M | $13.77M |
SXC vs. BTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXC SunCoke Energy, Inc. | 21.42% | -28.61% | 3.95% | 29.77% | 35.86% | 56.87% | -25.81% | -26.25% | -28.69% | 33.82% |
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | -27.83% | 44.18% | -12.80% | -7.03% | 162.36% | 317.84% | -73.57% | -67.32% | -21.62% | 31.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXC and BTU is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017 | 0.49 |
The correlation between SXC and BTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
SXC:
$719.56M
BTU:
$2.60B
SXC:
-$0.64
BTU:
-$0.98
SXC:
0.38
BTU:
0.66
SXC:
$1.90B
BTU:
$3.90B
SXC:
$150.60M
BTU:
$260.30M
SXC:
$130.50M
BTU:
$333.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXC vs. BTU — Risk / Return Rank
SXC
BTU
SXC vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SXC | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.72 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | 1.48 | +0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SXC vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXC drawdown since its inception was -90.41%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXC and BTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXC | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.41% | -98.07% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.04% | -47.12% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.99% | -65.14% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.99% | -67.44% | +15.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.18% | -48.36% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.79% | -48.00% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.02% | 22.79% | -7.77% |
Volatility
SXC vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) is 12.70%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 14.54%. This indicates that SXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXC | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.70% | 14.54% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.83% | 41.93% | -9.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.30% | 58.35% | -15.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.45% | 63.02% | -23.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.40% | 77.42% | -25.02% |
Dividends
SXC vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison
SXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than BTU's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | 1.41% | 1.01% | 1.43% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.43% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SXC SunCoke Energy, Inc. | 5.66% | 6.67% | 4.11% | 3.35% | 3.24% | 3.64% | 5.52% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.48% |
Financials
SXC vs. BTU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SunCoke Energy, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SXC vs. BTU - Profitability Comparison
SXC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.50M and revenue of 475.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.7%.
BTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 108.60M and revenue of 973.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.
SXC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 29.00M and revenue of 475.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.
BTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of -46.10M and revenue of 973.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.7%.
SXC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 13.10M and revenue of 475.30M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
BTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of -32.40M and revenue of 973.30M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXC and BTU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTU has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to SXC (12.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXC dropped -90.41% vs BTU's -98.07%.
BTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SXC and BTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer