METCB vs. METC
METCB (Ramaco Resources Inc.) and METC (Ramaco Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Coking Coal industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, METCB returned 76.20% vs 71.80% for METC. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
METCB vs. METC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METCB achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly higher than METC's -5.22% return.
METCB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 18.45%
- YTD
- 7.83%
- 6M
- -2.54%
- 1Y
- 76.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METC
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 13.51%
- YTD
- -5.22%
- 6M
- -6.26%
- 1Y
- 71.80%
- 3Y*
- 38.65%
- 5Y*
- 28.98%
- 10Y*
- —
METCB vs. METC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
METCB Ramaco Resources Inc. | 7.83% | 25.90% | -17.35% | 24.77% |
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | -5.22% | 94.40% | -37.24% | 117.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between METCB and METC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between METCB and METC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
METCB:
-$0.96
METC:
-$1.62
METCB:
1.51
METC:
1.22
METCB:
$523.58M
METC:
$523.58M
METCB:
-$7.12M
METC:
$10.83M
METCB:
$724.00K
METC:
$723.00K
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METCB vs. METC — Risk / Return Rank
METCB
METC
METCB vs. METC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources Inc. (METCB) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METCB | METC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 0.95 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | 1.35 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METCB | METC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.71 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.07 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
METCB vs. METC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METCB drawdown since its inception was -56.34%, smaller than the maximum METC drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METCB and METC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METCB | METC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.34% | -85.54% | +29.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.34% | -75.80% | +19.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.53% | -68.73% | +27.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.28% | -50.62% | +21.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.47% | 53.44% | -17.97% |
Volatility
METCB vs. METC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ramaco Resources Inc. (METCB) is 19.16%, while Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a volatility of 22.87%. This indicates that METCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METCB | METC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.16% | 22.87% | -3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.89% | 62.49% | -13.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.60% | 101.62% | -22.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.74% | 82.14% | -17.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.74% | 75.86% | -11.12% |
Dividends
METCB vs. METC - Dividend Comparison
Neither METCB nor METC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 1.10% | 5.32% | 2.91% | 5.11% |
METCB Ramaco Resources Inc. | 0.00% | 3.18% | 9.36% | 3.11% | 0.00% |
Financials
METCB vs. METC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources Inc. and Ramaco Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
METCB vs. METC - Profitability Comparison
METCB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
METC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
METCB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.0%.
METC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.0%.
METCB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported a net income of -18.32M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.
METC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -18.32M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
METCB and METC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METC has higher volatility (22.87%) compared to METCB (19.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METCB dropped -56.34% vs METC's -85.54%.
METCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METCB and METC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer