SWYMX vs. SWLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX).
SWYMX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Aug 24, 2016. SWLSX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Oct 3, 2005.
Performance
SWYMX vs. SWLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWYMX vs. SWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund | -3.72% | 19.42% | 14.24% | 20.92% | -17.65% | 17.80% | 14.66% | 25.34% | -7.58% | 20.48% |
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | -12.73% | 19.69% | 29.41% | 38.27% | -27.00% | 29.03% | 29.03% | 31.02% | -7.93% | 29.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWYMX achieves a -3.72% return, which is significantly higher than SWLSX's -12.73% return.
SWYMX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- -3.72%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.23%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
SWLSX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -8.75%
- YTD
- -12.73%
- 6M
- -11.11%
- 1Y
- 15.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWYMX vs. SWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWYMX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SWLSX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWYMX vs. SWLSX — Risk / Return Rank
SWYMX
SWLSX
SWYMX vs. SWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWYMX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 0.69 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.14 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.16 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 0.78 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.28 | 2.74 | +3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWYMX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.69 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.51 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWYMX and SWLSX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWYMX vs. SWLSX - Dividend Comparison
SWYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than SWLSX's 1.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.96% | 1.78% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 0.00% |
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | 1.34% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 2.07% | 7.77% | 1.07% | 5.32% | 12.35% | 7.92% | 4.46% | 17.08% |
Drawdowns
SWYMX vs. SWLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWYMX drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum SWLSX drawdown of -49.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYMX and SWLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWYMX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.48% | -49.89% | +19.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -16.17% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -31.32% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -16.17% | +7.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -7.98% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 4.57% | -2.29% |
Volatility
SWYMX vs. SWLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) is 4.72%, while Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that SWYMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWYMX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 5.73% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 12.41% | -4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 22.60% | -7.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 20.97% | -6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 20.76% | -5.10% |