PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWYGX vs. FCQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWYGX vs. FCQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYGX achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than FCQTX's 11.20% return.


SWYGX

1D
0.91%
1M
1.47%
YTD
10.03%
6M
9.80%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*

FCQTX

1D
1.17%
1M
2.47%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.13%
1Y
26.11%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYGX vs. FCQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SWYGX
Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund
10.03%17.57%12.83%19.45%-16.94%15.68%37.20%
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
11.20%20.74%15.64%21.56%-19.63%17.34%47.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYGX and FCQTX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020

0.96

The correlation between SWYGX and FCQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWYGX vs. FCQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWYGX
SWYGX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SWYGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FCQTX
FCQTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FCQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FCQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYGX vs. FCQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWYGXFCQTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.63

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.49

11.68

+1.81

SWYGX vs. FCQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FCQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYGX and FCQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWYGX vs. FCQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYGX drawdown since its inception was -27.62%, roughly equal to the maximum FCQTX drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYGX and FCQTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWYGXFCQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.62%

-27.34%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-9.83%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.96%

-15.53%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-27.34%

+3.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.04%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-5.85%

+1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

2.21%

-0.51%

Volatility

SWYGX vs. FCQTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) is 4.09%, while American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that SWYGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWYGXFCQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

5.24%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

10.65%

-2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

12.85%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

14.86%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.04%

15.12%

-1.08%

SWYGX vs. FCQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FCQTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWYGX vs. FCQTX - Dividend Comparison

SWYGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than FCQTX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
4.20%4.67%2.80%1.99%3.96%1.54%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWYGX
Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund
2.03%2.23%2.28%2.06%2.03%1.80%1.72%1.95%2.21%1.44%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SWYGX and FCQTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCQTX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to SWYGX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYGX dropped -27.62% vs FCQTX's -27.34%.

SWYGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWYGX and FCQTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer