PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWYGX vs. TRRJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYGX achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than TRRJX's 8.90% return.


SWYGX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.37%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.32%
1Y
22.19%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*

TRRJX

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.15%
YTD
8.90%
6M
8.39%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
13.67%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWYGX
Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund
9.93%17.57%12.83%19.45%-16.94%15.68%14.19%23.63%-6.62%19.12%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
8.90%10.96%11.99%18.14%-17.96%15.21%17.04%23.72%-6.95%20.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYGX and TRRJX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016

0.96

The correlation between SWYGX and TRRJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWYGX vs. TRRJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWYGX
SWYGX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SWYGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRJX
TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWYGXTRRJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.28

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

1.99

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.62

7.60

+6.02

SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the TRRJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYGX and TRRJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYGX drawdown since its inception was -27.62%, smaller than the maximum TRRJX drawdown of -53.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYGX and TRRJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWYGXTRRJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.62%

-53.57%

+25.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-8.06%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.96%

-12.52%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-25.85%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.39%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-6.63%

+2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

2.09%

-0.39%

Volatility

SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWYGXTRRJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.85%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

9.37%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

10.98%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

12.92%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.03%

13.57%

+0.46%

SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRJX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Dividend Comparison

SWYGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWYGX
Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund
2.03%2.23%2.28%2.06%2.03%1.80%1.72%1.95%2.21%1.44%1.13%0.00%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.36%4.68%9.67%6.89%4.80%5.68%8.55%3.80%2.89%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SWYGX and TRRJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWYGX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to TRRJX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYGX dropped -27.62% vs TRRJX's -53.57%.

SWYGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWYGX and TRRJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer