SWYGX vs. TRRJX
SWYGX (Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund) and TRRJX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. SWYGX is passively managed, while TRRJX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWYGX returned 8.29%/yr vs 6.12%/yr for TRRJX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SWYGX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for TRRJX.
Performance
SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWYGX achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly higher than TRRJX's 8.47% return.
SWYGX
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 6.60%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.32%
TRRJX
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 1Y
- 12.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWYGX Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund | 9.09% | 17.57% | 12.83% | 19.45% | -16.94% | 15.68% | 14.19% | 23.63% | -6.62% | 19.12% |
TRRJX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund | 8.47% | 10.96% | 11.99% | 18.14% | -17.96% | 15.21% | 17.04% | 23.72% | -6.95% | 20.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWYGX and TRRJX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SWYGX and TRRJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWYGX vs. TRRJX — Risk / Return Rank
SWYGX
TRRJX
SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWYGX | TRRJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 1.42 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | 5.35 | +4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWYGX drawdown since its inception was -27.62%, smaller than the maximum TRRJX drawdown of -53.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYGX and TRRJX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWYGX | TRRJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.62% | -53.57% | +25.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.50% | -8.06% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.96% | -12.52% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.07% | -25.85% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -0.98% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -6.61% | +2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.11% | -0.37% |
Volatility
SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) have volatilities of 2.90% and 2.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWYGX | TRRJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 2.78% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 8.83% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 11.22% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 12.93% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 13.47% | +0.53% |
SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWYGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRJX's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWYGX vs. TRRJX - Dividend Comparison
SWYGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWYGX Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund | 2.04% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 2.06% | 2.03% | 1.80% | 1.72% | 1.95% | 2.21% | 1.44% | 1.13% | 0.00% |
TRRJX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.36% | 4.68% | 9.67% | 6.89% | 4.80% | 5.68% | 8.55% | 3.80% | 2.89% | 4.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SWYGX and TRRJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWYGX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to TRRJX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYGX dropped -27.62% vs TRRJX's -53.57%.
SWYGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWYGX and TRRJX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer