SWYDX vs. FFANX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SWYDX (Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund) and FFANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund) are both mutual funds - SWYDX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while FFANX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, SWYDX returned 5.36%/yr vs 5.08%/yr for FFANX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SWYDX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FFANX.

Performance

SWYDX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund (SWYDX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYDX achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 6.38% return.

SWYDX

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 4.95%
• 6M: 4.43%
• 1Y: 12.16%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: 5.36%
• 10Y*: —

FFANX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 6.02%
• 1Y: 14.49%
• 3Y*: 10.91%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 6.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYDX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWYDX Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund	4.95%	12.60%	8.62%	14.47%	-14.78%	10.24%	12.37%	18.89%	-6.38%	14.53%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	6.38%	13.16%	7.40%	11.52%	-13.62%	8.03%	13.10%	15.81%	-4.06%	11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYDX and FFANX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016	0.95

The correlation between SWYDX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SWYDX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWYDX

SWYDX Risk / Return Rank: 58
SWYDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SWYDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SWYDX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SWYDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
SWYDX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FFANX

FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYDX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund (SWYDX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWYDX	FFANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.15	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	3.06	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.42	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	2.95	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.68	12.54	-0.87

SWYDX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYDX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWYDX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYDX drawdown since its inception was -20.49%, smaller than the maximum FFANX drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYDX and FFANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWYDX	FFANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.49%	-31.69%	+11.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.94%	-5.20%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.56%	-7.55%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.43%	-18.52%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-1.13%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.41%	-3.79%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	1.22%	-0.11%

Volatility

SWYDX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund (SWYDX) is 2.63%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that SWYDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWYDX	FFANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	3.12%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.41%	6.09%	-0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.55%	7.15%	-0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.25%	7.95%	+1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.82%	7.73%	+2.09%

SWYDX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYDX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWYDX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

SWYDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than FFANX's 3.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	3.69%	3.97%	2.81%	2.49%	5.75%	2.35%	2.36%	3.67%	4.56%	2.56%	1.43%	3.18%
SWYDX Schwab Target 2025 Index Fund	5.11%	5.37%	3.41%	2.58%	2.32%	1.92%	1.79%	1.91%	0.00%	1.33%	0.79%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWYDX and FFANX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, SWYDX and FFANX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SWYDX or FFANX?

FFANX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to SWYDX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYDX dropped -20.49% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.