PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWSSX vs. SNXFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWSSX vs. SNXFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWSSX achieves a 20.94% return, which is significantly higher than SNXFX's 11.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SWSSX has underperformed SNXFX with an annualized return of 10.76%, while SNXFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.82% annualized return.


SWSSX

1D
1.73%
1M
-0.41%
6M
13.29%
YTD
20.94%
1Y
36.49%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
10.76%
ALL TIME*
8.61%

SNXFX

1D
1.50%
1M
1.43%
6M
10.67%
YTD
11.96%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
20.63%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
14.82%
ALL TIME*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SWSSX vs. SNXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
20.94%12.88%11.57%17.07%-20.43%14.77%20.12%25.63%-11.19%14.76%
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
11.96%17.23%24.46%26.53%-19.46%26.10%20.71%31.43%-5.04%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SWSSX and SNXFX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998

0.87

The correlation between SWSSX and SNXFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWSSX vs. SNXFX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWSSX
SNXFX

Healthcare

20.2%
9.0%

Financial Services

17.6%
11.7%

Technology

14.8%
37.3%

Industrials

14.1%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
9.5%

Real Estate

6.7%
2.1%

Energy

5.4%
3.0%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.9%

Utilities

2.7%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
4.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
9.4%

Healthcare

SWSSX
20.2%
SNXFX
9.0%

Financial Services

SWSSX
17.6%
SNXFX
11.7%

Technology

SWSSX
14.8%
SNXFX
37.3%

Industrials

SWSSX
14.1%
SNXFX
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SWSSX
9.2%
SNXFX
9.5%

Real Estate

SWSSX
6.7%
SNXFX
2.1%

Energy

SWSSX
5.4%
SNXFX
3.0%

Basic Materials

SWSSX
4.4%
SNXFX
1.9%

Utilities

SWSSX
2.7%
SNXFX
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

SWSSX
2.6%
SNXFX
4.4%

Communication Services

SWSSX
2.2%
SNXFX
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWSSX vs. SNXFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWSSX
SWSSX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SWSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SWSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SNXFX
SNXFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SNXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SNXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWSSX vs. SNXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWSSXSNXFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.58

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.75

11.07

+1.68

SWSSX vs. SNXFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the SNXFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWSSX and SNXFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWSSX vs. SNXFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWSSX drawdown since its inception was -60.34%, which is greater than SNXFX's maximum drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWSSX and SNXFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWSSXSNXFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.34%

-55.08%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-8.94%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

-19.21%

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.93%

-25.36%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.81%

-34.58%

-7.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

0.00%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-8.72%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.08%

+1.02%

Volatility

SWSSX vs. SNXFX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) at 3.78%. This indicates that SWSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWSSXSNXFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

3.78%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

10.35%

+3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.38%

13.10%

+6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.57%

17.44%

+5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.08%

18.75%

+5.33%

SWSSX vs. SNXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWSSX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SNXFX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWSSX vs. SNXFX - Dividend Comparison

SWSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than SNXFX's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
1.30%1.45%1.23%1.41%1.61%1.74%2.76%3.01%6.49%4.23%3.41%6.31%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
1.06%1.29%1.66%1.49%1.32%8.88%2.55%6.12%10.45%5.22%4.10%6.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWSSX and SNXFX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWSSX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to SNXFX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWSSX dropped -60.34% vs SNXFX's -55.08%.

SWSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWSSX and SNXFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer