SWP vs. SPXM
SWP (SWP Growth & Income ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
SWP vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SWP
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWP vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF | 5.22% | 9.89% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWP and SPXM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWP vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
SWP
SPXM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SWP vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWP | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWP vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWP drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWP and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWP | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -5.08% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -0.75% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -0.78% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | — | — |
Volatility
SWP vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWP | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 7.83% | +4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 7.83% | +6.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 7.83% | +6.59% |
SWP vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWP vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
SWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF | 6.43% | 5.64% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWP and SPXM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for SWP.
SWP has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.
They also come from different issuers: SWP Investment Management and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SWP and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for SWP and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer