SWP vs. GXLC

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SWP (SWP Growth & Income ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SWP is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SWP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

SWP vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWP achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 10.06% return.

SWP

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.57%
• 6M: 3.89%
• YTD: 6.88%
• 1Y: 16.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.38%

GXLC

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 8.81%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	$27.98K	$20.23K	$17.31K
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF	$182.64K	$199.26K	$274.42K

SWP vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF	6.88%	2.34%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	10.06%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SWP and GXLC is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

SWP vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWP

SWP Risk / Return Rank: 49
SWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SWP Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SWP Martin Ratio Rank: 54

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWP vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWP	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.44	—	—

Drawdowns

SWP vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWP drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWP and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWP	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.41%	-9.08%	-7.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-1.48%	+0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.36%	-1.58%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SWP	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.28%	13.60%	-1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.23%	13.60%	+0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.23%	13.60%	+0.63%

SWP vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWP vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

SWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.64%, more than GXLC's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.64%	0.30%	0.00%
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF	8.64%	5.64%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWP and GXLC in my portfolio?

SWP and GXLC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SWP or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWP or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for SWP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SWP or GXLC?

SWP has the higher dividend yield at 8.64%, compared with 0.64% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between SWP and GXLC?

They also come from different issuers: SWP and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SWP and 0.02% for GXLC.