PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWOBX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWOBX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWOBX achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SWOBX has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 9.00%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


SWOBX

1D
-0.48%
1M
0.05%
YTD
4.87%
6M
4.33%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
9.00%

SWPPX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.75%
6M
8.76%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWOBX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWOBX
Schwab Balanced Fund™
4.87%12.76%12.51%18.25%-18.86%14.76%14.73%20.13%-4.35%15.52%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
9.75%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SWOBX and SWPPX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 1997

0.94

The correlation between SWOBX and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWOBX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWOBX
SWOBX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SWOBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWOBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWOBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SWOBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWOBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWOBX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWOBXSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.02

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

13.59

-3.36

SWOBX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWOBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWOBX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWOBX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWOBX drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWOBX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWOBXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.99%

-55.06%

+19.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.58%

-8.89%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.72%

-18.74%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.30%

-24.51%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.30%

-33.80%

+5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.74%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-9.93%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.97%

-0.44%

Volatility

SWOBX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) is 3.46%, while Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that SWOBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWOBXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

4.73%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

9.87%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.10%

12.53%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

17.02%

-2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.91%

18.27%

-5.36%

SWOBX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWOBX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWOBX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

SWOBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than SWPPX's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWOBX
Schwab Balanced Fund™
5.22%5.47%4.94%5.67%10.21%6.47%2.97%5.21%7.11%3.20%7.83%7.66%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
1.01%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SWOBX and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWPPX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to SWOBX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWOBX dropped -35.99% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWOBX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer