SWMCX vs. SFLNX
SWMCX (Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund) and SFLNX (Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SWMCX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SFLNX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI US Large Company Index. Over the past 5 years, SWMCX returned 8.33%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for SFLNX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWMCX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SFLNX.
Performance
SWMCX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWMCX achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly lower than SFLNX's 14.66% return.
SWMCX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- —
SFLNX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 14.73%
- 1Y
- 32.46%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
SWMCX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 12.72% | 10.54% | 15.28% | 17.20% | -17.31% | 22.55% | 17.03% | 30.46% | -9.16% | 0.40% |
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund | 14.66% | 17.02% | 16.78% | 18.16% | -6.89% | 31.64% | 9.12% | 28.91% | -7.43% | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWMCX and SFLNX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SWMCX and SFLNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SWMCX vs. SFLNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWMCX
SFLNX
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
SWMCX
SFLNX
Technology
SWMCX
SFLNX
Financial Services
SWMCX
SFLNX
Consumer Cyclical
SWMCX
SFLNX
Healthcare
SWMCX
SFLNX
Energy
SWMCX
SFLNX
Real Estate
SWMCX
SFLNX
Utilities
SWMCX
SFLNX
Basic Materials
SWMCX
SFLNX
Consumer Defensive
SWMCX
SFLNX
Communication Services
SWMCX
SFLNX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWMCX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank
SWMCX
SFLNX
SWMCX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWMCX | SFLNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.59 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 5.47 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 21.47 | -10.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWMCX | SFLNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 3.23 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.85 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.53 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SWMCX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWMCX drawdown since its inception was -40.34%, smaller than the maximum SFLNX drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWMCX and SFLNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWMCX | SFLNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.34% | -56.18% | +15.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -6.10% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.07% | -16.27% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | -18.98% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.63% | -6.01% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.55% | +0.57% |
Volatility
SWMCX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 2.48%. This indicates that SWMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWMCX | SFLNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 2.48% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 7.43% | +2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 10.35% | +3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 15.26% | +2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 18.40% | +2.24% |
SWMCX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWMCX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWMCX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison
SWMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than SFLNX's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.78% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 4.78% | 6.17% | 5.33% | 9.69% | 3.28% | 7.23% | 5.68% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 1.89% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.49% | 1.59% | 2.93% | 1.45% | 2.44% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWMCX and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWMCX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to SFLNX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWMCX dropped -40.34% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.
SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWMCX and SFLNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer