SWLSX vs. SNXFX
SWLSX (Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™) and SNXFX (Schwab 1000 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SWLSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SNXFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index. Over the past 10 years, SWLSX returned 16.76%/yr vs 15.29%/yr for SNXFX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWLSX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SNXFX.
Performance
SWLSX vs. SNXFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWLSX achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than SNXFX's 11.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SWLSX has outperformed SNXFX with an annualized return of 16.76%, while SNXFX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.29% annualized return.
SWLSX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 7.06%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- 24.86%
- 5Y*
- 16.18%
- 10Y*
- 16.76%
SNXFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.29%
SWLSX vs. SNXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | 11.17% | 19.69% | 29.41% | 38.27% | -27.00% | 29.03% | 29.03% | 31.02% | -7.93% | 29.01% |
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 11.89% | 17.23% | 24.46% | 26.53% | -19.46% | 26.10% | 20.71% | 31.43% | -5.04% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWLSX and SNXFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SWLSX and SNXFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SWLSX vs. SNXFX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWLSX
SNXFX
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SWLSX
SNXFX
Communication Services
SWLSX
SNXFX
Consumer Cyclical
SWLSX
SNXFX
Healthcare
SWLSX
SNXFX
Industrials
SWLSX
SNXFX
Financial Services
SWLSX
SNXFX
Consumer Defensive
SWLSX
SNXFX
Energy
SWLSX
SNXFX
Basic Materials
SWLSX
-
SNXFX
Real Estate
SWLSX
-
SNXFX
Utilities
SWLSX
-
SNXFX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWLSX vs. SNXFX — Risk / Return Rank
SWLSX
SNXFX
SWLSX vs. SNXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWLSX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 2.44 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 3.32 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.44 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 3.31 | -1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | 15.28 | -8.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWLSX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.44 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.78 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.82 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.58 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SWLSX vs. SNXFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWLSX drawdown since its inception was -49.89%, smaller than the maximum SNXFX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLSX and SNXFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWLSX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.89% | -55.08% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -8.94% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.93% | -19.21% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.32% | -25.36% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.32% | -34.58% | +3.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -8.76% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 1.93% | +2.74% |
Volatility
SWLSX vs. SNXFX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) at 2.87%. This indicates that SWLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWLSX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 2.87% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.26% | 9.13% | +3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.02% | 12.12% | +3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 17.31% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 18.73% | +2.11% |
SWLSX vs. SNXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWLSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SNXFX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWLSX vs. SNXFX - Dividend Comparison
SWLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than SNXFX's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 1.30% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 3.01% | 6.49% | 4.23% | 3.41% | 6.31% |
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | 1.05% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 2.07% | 7.77% | 1.07% | 5.32% | 12.35% | 7.92% | 4.46% | 17.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SWLSX and SNXFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWLSX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to SNXFX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLSX dropped -49.89% vs SNXFX's -55.08%.
SNXFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWLSX and SNXFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer