SWLSX vs. SFLNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWLSX (Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™) and SFLNX (Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SWLSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SFLNX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI US Large Company Index. Over the past 10 years, SWLSX returned 16.76%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for SFLNX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWLSX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SFLNX.

Performance

SWLSX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWLSX achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than SFLNX's 14.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SWLSX has outperformed SFLNX with an annualized return of 16.76%, while SFLNX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.26% annualized return.

SWLSX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 7.06%
• YTD: 11.17%
• 6M: 10.00%
• 1Y: 29.73%
• 3Y*: 24.86%
• 5Y*: 16.18%
• 10Y*: 16.76%

SFLNX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 14.66%
• 6M: 14.73%
• 1Y: 32.46%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWLSX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™	11.17%	19.69%	29.41%	38.27%	-27.00%	29.03%	29.03%	31.02%	-7.93%	29.01%
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund	14.66%	17.02%	16.78%	18.16%	-6.89%	31.64%	9.12%	28.91%	-7.43%	17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SWLSX and SFLNX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008	0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between SWLSX and SFLNX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SWLSX vs. SFLNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWLSX	SFLNX
Technology	47.7%	19.0%
Communication Services	14.3%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	13.1%	9.2%
Healthcare	7.6%	11.9%
Industrials	7.5%	9.4%
Financial Services	6.2%	13.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	7.4%
Energy	0.4%	10.2%
Basic Materials	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

SWLSX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWLSX

SWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 35
SWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

SFLNX

SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 92
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWLSX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWLSX	SFLNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	3.23	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	4.50	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.59	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	5.47	-3.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.56	21.47	-14.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWLSX vs. SFLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the SFLNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLSX and SFLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWLSX	SFLNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	3.23	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.85	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.78	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.53	+0.04

Drawdowns

SWLSX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWLSX drawdown since its inception was -49.89%, smaller than the maximum SFLNX drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLSX and SFLNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWLSX	SFLNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.89%	-56.18%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.17%	-6.10%	-10.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.93%	-16.27%	-6.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.32%	-18.98%	-12.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.32%	-37.59%	+6.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	-6.01%	-1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.67%	1.55%	+3.12%

Volatility

SWLSX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 2.48%. This indicates that SWLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWLSX	SFLNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	2.48%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.26%	7.43%	+4.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.02%	10.35%	+5.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.04%	15.26%	+5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.84%	18.40%	+2.44%

SWLSX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWLSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWLSX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison

SWLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than SFLNX's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund	1.46%	1.68%	1.78%	1.86%	2.09%	4.78%	6.17%	5.33%	9.69%	3.28%	7.23%	5.68%
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™	1.05%	1.17%	0.11%	0.04%	2.07%	7.77%	1.07%	5.32%	12.35%	7.92%	4.46%	17.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWLSX and SFLNX in my portfolio?

SWLSX and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWLSX or SFLNX?

SWLSX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to SFLNX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLSX dropped -49.89% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.